Comments to the Study: Săvulescu J., Autonomy, the Good Life, and Controversial Choices, in , Rhodes R., Francis L.P., Silvers A. (eds.), 2007,
Comments to the Study: Săvulescu J., Autonomy, the Good Life, and Controversial Choices, in , Rhodes R., Francis L.P., Silvers A. (eds.), 2007, l

Summary/Abstract: Julian Savulescu performs an analysis of the relationship between autonomy and the idea of a “good life”, starting from the perspective of controversial elections. The author shows that the choices based on individual values and different from the common ones, represent a challenge in generally, and particularly in medical ethics, which call into question the principle of action in the interest of the patient.

• Details
• Contents