ATTRIBUTING THE PERPETRATION OF SO-CALLED FORMAL AND CONSEQUENCE CRIMES IN A STATIC SENSE Cover Image

O PRZYPISYWANIU SPRAWSTWA CZYNU ZABRONIONEGO W PRZYPADKU TYPÓW FORMALNYCH I TYPÓW ZNAMIENNYCH SKUTKIEM W SENSIE STATYCZNYM
ATTRIBUTING THE PERPETRATION OF SO-CALLED FORMAL AND CONSEQUENCE CRIMES IN A STATIC SENSE

Author(s): Szymon Tarapata
Subject(s): Criminal Law, Criminology
Published by: Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza
Keywords: attribution; perpetration; formal types; consequence types; static consequence; dynamic consequence;

Summary/Abstract: The aim of the article is to determine the content of the premises for attributing the perpetration of formal and consequence crimes in a static sense. In the text it is demonstrated that when examining the perpetration of formal types and consequence types in a static sense, a number of elements applied in the process of the so-called objective attribution of a consequence in the dynamic sense can be used. It is also emphasized that within formal and effectual acts in the static sense one can find specific counterparts of the so-called negative reasons for attributing a consequence in the dynamic sense.

  • Issue Year: 82/2020
  • Issue No: 4
  • Page Range: 245-258
  • Page Count: 14
  • Language: Polish
Toggle Accessibility Mode