Se poate face știință a limbii fără a ține seamă de știința literaturii și invers?
Language and literature research are only formally two different concerns. In fact, they depend on each other. A literary analysis will never be complete unless it contains "traces" of linguistic research, while a meaningful linguistic interpretation will only be achieved by using observations from the sphere of literary commentary. We call into question a so-called investigation that claims to be of literary criticism if it is limited to the specific tools of the discipline in question omitting the lexical-grammatical arguments that support and justify the demonstration. We believe that any statement related to a literary text must find support in a fact of language. In the same way, the grammatical research of the aesthetic sign cannot exclude considerations from the literary field to confirm the option for a specific lexical meaning, morphological value or syntactic function. The two branches of humanistic science are indispensable to each other, and their combination will lead to identifying the complete meaning of a text.In the present article, we will try to demonstrate how the specific tools of each of the before-mentioned disciplines, put at the service of the same discourse, save the material of cognitive insufficiency and generate a complex perspective on the analysed discourse. We will use linguistic, lexical-grammatical and semantic terminology.
More...