FORMS AND METHODS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS AS FACTORS ? IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HUMANITARIAN SPHERE OF THE REGION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF TERNOPIL REGION)
FORMS AND METHODS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS AS FACTORS ? IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HUMANITARIAN SPHERE OF THE REGION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF TERNOPIL REGION)

Summary/Abstract: The article has a theoretical and practical nature and is devoted to the characterization of formsand methods in the process of interaction between public authorities and public organizations inthe development of the humanitarian sphere of the region. It is noted that the coordinateddevelopment of the humanitarian sphere by the authorities and the public is an important stage inthe formation of the Ukrainian state. Considerable attention is paid to the analysis of cooperationbetween public authorities and public organizations in the Ternopil region. Based on the analysisand generalization of the results of interaction between public authorities and public organizations,the need for changes in planning the development of the humanitarian sphere of the region isemphasized. The importance of forming and establishing interaction between all actors influencingthe development of the humanitarian sphere is substantiated. The assessment of forms(organizational, organizational and legal), methods (humanitarian, administrative, sociopolitical);moral and ethical are especially distinguished, given their greatest role in the "service"of the humanitarian sphere. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the interaction between theexecutive body and public organizations is carried out, specific examples from the Ternopil regionare given, a number of documents, orders of the regional state administration, jointly organizedevents by the regional authorities and public organizations are analyzed. Possibilities of theanalysis and an estimation of efficiency of interaction of the power and public organizations indevelopment of public opinion are allocated. It is this form of evaluation that makes it possible tocompare the level and results of cooperation, to compare with the needs, ideals and expectationsof people the results of cooperation in the field of humanitarian development of the region.

• Details
• Contents