Consideraţii critice referitoare la Decizia nr. 12/2020, pronunţată de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Completul pentru soluţionarea recursului în interesul legii
Critical considerations regarding Decision no. 12/2020, pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice – Section for Appeal in the Interest of the Law
Author(s): Claudia Roșu, Alin Speriusi-VladSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Court case
Published by: C.H. Beck Publishing House - Romania
Keywords: judicial fine; recourse in the interest of the law; contestation; remedy;
Summary/Abstract: The authors analyzed the decision of the Supreme Court by an appeal in the interest of the law, regarding the possibility of the party fined according to art. 187 parag. (1) pt. 1 let. a) Code of Civil Procedure, for the introduction, in bad faith, of a civil action, accessory, additional or incidental requests, as well as for the exercise of some appeals, obviously unfounded, by the same decision by which these requests were solved, to submit in the appeal filed to the superior court, criticisms concerning the judicial fine.In the opinion of the authors, the correct interpretation is that these criticisms can be formulated in the appeal filed to the superior court, together with all the other criticisms regarding the solution of the lower court, when the fine was applied by the same decision by which those requests were solved.
Journal: Analele Universității București – Seria Drept (AUB)
- Issue Year: 2020
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 38-53
- Page Count: 16
- Language: Romanian
- Content File-PDF