ZERO ET INFINI DE BERGSON ET NEANT
BERGSON’S ZERO AND INFINITE, AND NOTHINGNESS

Summary/Abstract: In „Creative Evolution,” Bergson denied the notion of nothingness. In his book, nothingness is only a notion of abstract error as a square circle. More still something is missing or nothing, another exists. But he implicitly approached and supported my principle of nothingness and love in „Introduction to Metaphysics”, which sums up the essence of his philosophy. We note even more that he used the dialectic of the thesis and the antithesis when he explained the zero and the infinite. According to Bergson’s philosophy, dialectics is secondary meaning as the relaxation of intuition for intuition. What is the meaning of the change of direction? This is the proof that intuition and dialectic are simultaneously inseparable from my point of view and similar to the relation of nothingness and the infinite. The explanation of zero and infinity recalls Pascal’s idea in philosophical history. I want to explain the zero and the infinite, the nothingness of Pascal and explore the „center of inner creation’ (center of the universe) proposed by Kitarō Nishida.

• Details
• Contents