DOES ART 21 PARA 6 OF THE LAW NO 165/2013 STILL OFFER US SURPRISES?
DOES ART 21 PARA 6 OF THE LAW NO 165/2013 STILL OFFER US SURPRISES?
Author(s): Andrei SoareSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, Civil Law
Published by: C.H. Beck Publishing House - Romania
Keywords: resolving legal issues; effects; restitution of property; real estate evaluation; notarial grids;
Summary/Abstract: The current version of Art 21 Para 6 of Law no 165/20132represents the wording by which the Romanian Parliament balanced the provisions of the Constitution with the concrete way of valuing real estate in order to grant remedial measures in equivalent, in the form of compensation points. The present study seeks to answer the question: whether the current wording, being the eighth intervention that the legislature has made on a single article, solves the problems that arise during its application, in this vital matter for the beneficiaries of the law represented by real estate valuation in in order to establish the number of compensation points. The guide in the trip I propose will be the Decision no 9/20223 pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice – Panel for resolving legal issues on 21February 2022.
Journal: Istorie, Cultura, Cetatenie in Uniunea Europeana
- Issue Year: 14/2022
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 432-443
- Page Count: 12
- Language: English