Şulman'ın Siyaset Bilimi Eleştirisi ve Hibrit Rejimler
Schulmann's Critique on Political Science and Hybrid Regimes
Author(s): Erkam TemirSubject(s): Political Philosophy, Political history, Government/Political systems, Post-War period (1950 - 1989)
Published by: Kastamonu Üniversitesi
Keywords: Decision-making; Hybrid regimes; Political science; Russia; Schulmann;
Summary/Abstract: The semi-autocratic and semi-democratic political regimes that started to emerge after the Cold War were called ‘hybrid regimes’. In the beginning, hybrid regimes were seen as a stage before the transition to full democracy. Although some hybrid regimes have democratized over the years, some have not changed at all, and even some of them have become more autocratic. Therefore, theories about hybrid regimes have started to evolve. In this article, Russian political scientist Ekaterina Mikhailovna Schulmann's views on political science criticism and hybrid regimes are discussed. Schulmann is shown among the most influential political scientists and most influential women in Russia. Schulmann’s ideas and observations on hybrid regimes are valuable as they offer an insider and original view. In fact, western theorists built the main lines in the formation of the concept. However, her approach went beyond being a local adaptation of the ideas of western theorists. Expanding the theoretical framework of the concept, Shulman developed the theory and established a balanced link between theory and truth. The article includes Schulmann's critique of political science. Her ideas about hybrid regimes are discussed. Issues such as the functioning of decision-making processes in hybrid regimes, how the power has changed hands, and the tendency of autocratization and democratization have been examined.
Journal: Alınteri Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
- Issue Year: 6/2022
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 113-132
- Page Count: 20
- Language: Turkish