INTENTION AND RESPONSIBILITY IN DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE. A VIEW FROM THE SPEECH ACT THEORY Cover Image

INTENTION AND RESPONSIBILITY IN DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE. A VIEW FROM THE SPEECH ACT THEORY
INTENTION AND RESPONSIBILITY IN DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE. A VIEW FROM THE SPEECH ACT THEORY

Author(s): Maciej Witek
Subject(s): Semiology
Published by: Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
Keywords: demonstrative reference; demonstrative gestures; directing intentions; responsibilism; locution; illocution; perlocution;

Summary/Abstract: Korta and Perry (2011) argue that the object a speaker refers to with a demonstrative expression combined with a pointing gesture is determined by her directing intention rather than by her demonstration. They acknowledge that our use of the ordinary concept of “what is said” is affected by our judgements about the speaker’s responsibility for the results of her careless pointing; however, they claim that the effects are perlocutionary and have no bearing on determining the referential content of the speaker’s act.I argue that the consequences of careless pointing are illocutionary and play a role in determining demonstrative reference. I also distinguish between two types of referential content which are attributable to the speaker’s utterance and shape its discursive behaviour: what is intended, which is determined by the speaker’s directing intention, and what is public, which depends on what she can legitimately be held responsible for.

  • Issue Year: 36/2022
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 63-84
  • Page Count: 22
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode