ANALYSIS OF SOME PRACTICES OF THE JUDICIARY THAT CONTRAVENE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROVISIONS, EUROPEAN REGULATIONS AND ECHR CASE LAW ON PREVENTIVE MEASURES. CONTRADICTORY CASE LAW: HUNEDOARA TRIBUNAL – SIBIU TRIBUNAL Cover Image

ANALIZA UNOR PRACTICI ALE ORGANELOR JUDICIARE CARE CONTRAVIN PREVEDERILOR PROCESUAL PENALE, REGLEMENTĂRILOR EUROPENE ŞI JURISPRUDENŢEI CEDO LEGATE DE MĂSURILE PREVENTIVE. JURISPRUDENŢA CONTRADICTORIE: TRIBUNALUL HUNEDOARA - TRIBUNALUL SIBIU
ANALYSIS OF SOME PRACTICES OF THE JUDICIARY THAT CONTRAVENE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROVISIONS, EUROPEAN REGULATIONS AND ECHR CASE LAW ON PREVENTIVE MEASURES. CONTRADICTORY CASE LAW: HUNEDOARA TRIBUNAL – SIBIU TRIBUNAL

Author(s): Ioan Lazăr
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: Preventive measures; European regulations; ECHR case law;

Summary/Abstract: In this approach we will start from concrete jurisprudential analyses and stop there with conclusions. We will try to analyse inappropriate judicial practices in the context of considering and ordering preventive measures.

  • Issue Year: 2024
  • Issue No: 03
  • Page Range: 48-55
  • Page Count: 8
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode