John Rawls i sloboda političkog govora Slučaj Trump vs. Twitter
John Rawls and the Freedom of Political Speech Case Trump vs. Twitter
Author(s): Marita Brčić KuljišSubject(s): Media studies, Ethics / Practical Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Social Philosophy, Contemporary Philosophy
Published by: Hrvatsko Filozofsko Društvo
Keywords: public reason; political liberalism; John Rawls; reasonable; freedom of political speech; Trump vs. Twitter;
Summary/Abstract: Free political speech – understood as (1) the right to publicly criticize the government, (2) the right to represent theories and ideologies that are contrary to the ruling one, (3) the right to advocate political and institutional changes, etc. – is the speech that enables a fundamental distinction between democratic and non-democratic systems. As part of the discussions on free political speech, the discussions related to the very content of the freedom of political speech that incites rebellion against the political order are particularly important; they advocate racism, hate speech or, for example, the disclosure of state secrets. In this context, we will open a discussion about the freedom of political speech in Rawls’s political liberalism with special emphasis on the idea of the public reason, and so that the discussion does not remain at the level of theoretical analysis, we will analyze Rawls’s understanding of the freedom of political speech additionally through the case of Trump vs. Twitter.
Journal: Filozofska istraživanja
- Issue Year: 43/2023
- Issue No: 03/171
- Page Range: 509-528
- Page Count: 20
- Language: Croatian