The Problem of Realism in Vihalemm Cover Image

The Problem of Realism in Vihalemm
The Problem of Realism in Vihalemm

Author(s): Juho Lindholm
Subject(s): Pragmatism, Analytic Philosophy, Marxism, Philosophy of Science
Published by: Tallinna Tehnikaülikooli õiguse instituut
Keywords: Immanuel Kant; Marxism; philosophy of science; practical realism; practice; pragmatism; Rein Vihalemm; scientific realism; Thomas Kuhn;

Summary/Abstract: The Estonian philosopher Rein Vihalemm (1938–2015) wished to reform realism in the philosophy of science. He was dissatisfied with the mainstream analytic philosophy of science—scientific realism and the various anti-realisms alike. He considered these approaches theory-driven and hence too distanced from actual scientific practice. His alternative, which he called practical realism, was inspired and influenced by Joseph Rouse’s original reading of Thomas Kuhn. Moreover, Vihalemm viewed as important some lessons from Marxism, which was prevalent in Estonian philosophy during the Soviet occupation. For him, Marx himself inaugurated practical realism with his novel notion of practice that does not consider agency distinct from nature. He also mentions Kant, interpreted in a realistic manner, as a significant influence for his thesis that concepts only apply to practice. In this article, I will critically examine practical realism from the standpoint of classical pragmatism. My primary question is: what kind of realism practical realism can possibly be.

  • Issue Year: 12/2024
  • Issue No: 1
  • Page Range: 37-71
  • Page Count: 35
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode