DISJUNCTURE VS REVOLUTION POSTGRESSION VS. PROGRESSION
DISJUNCTURE VS REVOLUTION POSTGRESSION VS. PROGRESSION

Summary/Abstract: We are living on a biased philosophy, and we limit ourselves to a simple choice between A and B, B being non-A. One crucial creational generative moment with nothing before, or nothing specified, or some metaphorical something. Either Big Bang, in an unspecified situation, or emergence from “physical logic.” Or some divine generating creator of universal and life. Any freedom, free choice, responsibility for man? In recent archaeological discoveries, some approaches were biased and destroyed a lot of what they should have discovered. Naledi’s small brain, several steps before Homo Sapiens, invented burials and the first symbolical scratches on the walls of these chambers. Only be produced by big-brained Hominins? What about Neanderthals and Denisovans. Any free choice in the evolution of a language? Is writing an invention around 4-3,000 BCE? Naledi proves it is wrong. The rotation of vowels and consonants increases lexical creativity connected with the brain machine-code that remembers what is useful for biological survival, writing is envisaged and experimented. From a set of limited calls (postgressively containing/producing human language) to a first batch of illimited vocal clusters (progressively produced from what was before), the road to articulated language is blazed. Yet diversification? The matrix of linguistic phylogeny?

• Details
• Contents