DA LI JE SVE ZNANJE PROPOZICIJSKO?
IS ALL KNOWLEDGE PREPOSITIONAL?
Author(s): Miroslava AndjelkovićSubject(s): Philosophy, Epistemology
Published by: Filozofsko društvo Srbije
Keywords: knowledge that; knowing how; Intellectualist legend; Asymmetry argument;
Summary/Abstract: This paper deals with a criticism of Ryle's claim that the so called Intellectualist legend leads to an infinite regress. Critics have attempted to show that Ryle's argument cannot even get off the ground since its two basic premises cannot be true at the same time. In the paper I argue that this objection is based on a misinterpretation of Ryle’s argumentation, which is complex and consists of two arguments, not of a single one as it is claimed. One of Ryle’s argumentats attacks the thesis that an intelligent act is an indirect result of propositional knowledge, while the other, which I call the Asymmetry argument, claims that not every manifestation of knowledge that is accompanied with the manifestation of knowing how. In the paper I argue that both Ryle’s arguments are valid and resistant to recent critique, so it can be said that Ryle’s distinction between knowledge that and knowing how is still an important distinction within contemporary epistemology.
Journal: Theoria
- Issue Year: 48/2005
- Issue No: 1-2
- Page Range: 1-19
- Page Count: 19
- Language: Serbian