AREN’T DECISIONS IN THE INTEREST OF THE LAW ACTUALLY INTERPRETATIVE LAWS?
AREN’T DECISIONS IN THE INTEREST OF THE LAW ACTUALLY INTERPRETATIVE LAWS?
Author(s): Samu AronSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai
Keywords: Review in the interest of the law; Decision in the interest of the law; interpretative law; the applying of the law over time; the control over the constitutionality of laws
Summary/Abstract: Aren’t Decisions in the interest of the law actually interpretative laws? Following a thorough theoretical analysis, of both the constitutional framework, as well as the relevant legal provisions, conducted by always relating to the vast jurisprudence that the Constitutional Court has established in the matter, and also to the doctrinarian studies that have investigated the issue as well, we believe that our current study managed to prove that the question should be answered in an affirmative way. And it didn’t stop here, but pressed on to also analyze the practical consequences which derive from such an answer. The result? The shaping of a new theory, whose implications add a bit of color to the constitutional law landscape.
Journal: Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyai - Iurisprudentia
- Issue Year: 54/2009
- Issue No: 3
- Page Range: 74-120
- Page Count: 47
- Language: English
