The Nature of the Judicial Process (I)
Natura procesului judiciar (I)
Author(s): Benjamin N. CardozoSubject(s): Politics / Political Sciences
Published by: Centrul de Studii Internationale
Keywords: method of Philosophy; method of common law; methods of History Tradition and Sociology
Summary/Abstract: Fragment of the original text: „The work of deciding cases goes on every day in hundreds of courts throughout the land. Any judge, one might suppose, would find it easy to describe the process which he had followed a thousand times and more. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Let some intelligent layman ask him to explain: he will not go very far before taking refuge in the excuse that the language of craftsmen is unintelligible to those untutored in the craft. Such an excuse may cover with a semblance of respectability an otherwise ignominious retreat. It will hardly serve to still the pricks of curiosity and conscience. In this mental background every problem finds its setting. We may try to see things as objectively as we please. None the less, we can never see them with any eyes except our own. To that test they are all brought - a form of pleading or an act of parliament, the wrongs of paupers or the rights of princes, a village ordinance or a nation's charter. The method of philosophy comes in competition, however, with other tendencies which find their outlet in other methods. One of these is the historical method, or the method of evolution.”
Journal: Noua Revistă de Drepturile Omului
- Issue Year: 3/2007
- Issue No: 3
- Page Range: 129-156
- Page Count: 28
- Language: Romanian