Optimisation of Criminal Procedure: Preconditions and Possibilities for Written Procedure Cover Image

Baudžiamojo proceso optimizavimas: rašytinio proceso prielaidos ir galimybės
Optimisation of Criminal Procedure: Preconditions and Possibilities for Written Procedure

Author(s): Ernestas Rimšelis, Raimundas Jurka
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Mykolas Romeris University
Keywords: criminal procedure; procedural form; public hearing; oral procedure; written procedure

Summary/Abstract: Endeavours of politicians, representatives of law enforcement institutions and courts to create simplified, accelerated and less human and time resources requiring legal procedures in criminal cases prompted the authors of this article to assess the possibilities to develop the written form of procedure in Lithuania. The goal of the authors of this article is to assess the origin and goals of the written form of procedure, as well as to define the main rules and points for discussions on the possibilities to develop the written form of procedure in the Lithuanian criminal procedural law. The conclusion is drawn in this article to the effect that written form of procedure is seen as a condition for simplifying and accelerating the legal process, and choosing this form of procedure is not considered as denying or restraining the expectations of participants of criminal procedure towards a fair trial. The analysis provides the basis for the authors to make a conclusion on the appropriate limits of applying written or oral procedures for hearing criminal cases: Oral procedure must be guaranteed in cases where questions of criminal liability and personal guilt are solved at the first instance court hearings; Oral procedure usually has to be guaranteed in cases where during the procedure at the first instance court hearing the questions of criminal liability and personal guilt are solved, although oral procedure may be limited and the procedure may be conducted in written form if new evidence are not investigated and there is no doubt for deciding whether oral procedure is better for understanding the case; Oral procedure need not be guaranteed only in cases where questions of application of the law are solved and if oral procedure was guaranteed during the procedure at the court of first instance; Written procedure may guarantee the right to a fair trial, where the participants of the procedure are allowed to provide various explanations and written documents or a person is allowed to ask for an oral court hearing.

  • Issue Year: 19/2012
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 753-769
  • Page Count: 18
  • Language: Lithuanian