Optional Stops, Foregone Conclusions, and the Value of Argument
Optional Stops, Foregone Conclusions, and the Value of Argument
Author(s): Catherine Z. ElginSubject(s): Philosophy
Published by: KruZak
Summary/Abstract: If the point of argument is to produce conviction, an argument for a foregone conclusion is pointless. I maintain, however, that an argument makes a variety of cognitive contributions, even when its conclusion is already believed. It exhibits warrant. It affords reasons that we can impart to others. It identifies bases for agreement among parties who otherwise disagree. It underwrites confidence, by showing how vulnerable warrant is under changes in background assumptions. Multiple arguments for the same conclusion show how our beliefs hang together.
Journal: Croatian Journal of Philosophy
- Issue Year: IV/2004
- Issue No: 12
- Page Range: 317-329
- Page Count: 13
- Language: English
- Content File-PDF