Argumenti za i protiv »poboljšanja« ljudskih bića genetskom intervencijom
Arguments Pro and Con of the “Enhancement” of Human Beings through Genetic Intervention

Summary/Abstract: The paper aims to explain two basic standpoints regarding the enhancement of human beings through genetic engineering. Savulescu seems to be starting from a technoprogressive, (neo)liberal orientation, while Fukuyama′s position implies a step back – to (bio)conservatism, returning to the natural human rights. These opposing general attitudes reflect the same aspiration – towards greater control and monitoring by the state for the benefit of individuals and (or) humankind. While Fukuyama justifies the narrow use of biotechnology for the purpose of therapy and prevention of disease, so far Savulescu goes a step further, understanding „enhancement“ to include increasing the length and quality of life, and focuses exclusively on genetic intervention for this purpose. Discussing the same problems Fukuyama lists several reasons why we should limit the use of biotechnology – reasons of religious, utilitarian and philosophical nature. In this paper, arguments for and against genetic intervention are discussed, while cited examples are commented ad hoc.

• Details
• Contents