Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Łodzi z dnia 25 sierpnia 2009 r. sygn. akt III Apo 2/09
A Commentary on the Decision of the Court of Appeal in Łódź of August 25, 2009, Case Reference No. III Apo 2/09

Summary/Abstract: This commentary refers to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Łódź, Department III of Laborand Social Security, of August 25, 2009 concerning the appellation of El¿bieta S. against a verdictof the Supreme Medical Court issued on February 18, 2009 (case reference no. NSL Rep.93/08) to revoke the penalty of suspension of the right to practice the profession for a period ofsix months. The appeal was rejected. The commentary presents the view that the Court of Appeal issued its decision while failingto take into account the standpoint present in the doctrine that when the Supreme Medical Court“ pronounces the penalty of suspension of the right to practice profession or revocation of theright to pursue one’s profession, the verdict does not become automatically binding as the penalized physician still has the right to appeal to the Supreme Court”. This standpoint should be fully appreciated in contrast to the decision of the Court of Appeal in question.Łódź

• Details
• Contents