ESTE ADMISIBILĂ EXERCITAREA CĂILOR DE ATAC ÎMPOTRIVA SOLUŢIILOR MINISTERULUI PUBLIC DE RESPINGERE A SESIZĂRILOR PENALE FORMULATE DE CURTEA DE CONTURI A ROMÂNIEI? Cover Image

ESTE ADMISIBILĂ EXERCITAREA CĂILOR DE ATAC ÎMPOTRIVA SOLUŢIILOR MINISTERULUI PUBLIC DE RESPINGERE A SESIZĂRILOR PENALE FORMULATE DE CURTEA DE CONTURI A ROMÂNIEI?
ESTE ADMISIBILĂ EXERCITAREA CĂILOR DE ATAC ÎMPOTRIVA SOLUŢIILOR MINISTERULUI PUBLIC DE RESPINGERE A SESIZĂRILOR PENALE FORMULATE DE CURTEA DE CONTURI A ROMÂNIEI?

Author(s): Verginia Vedinaș, Mihaela Duţă
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: admissibility of remedies at law; Public Ministry; criminal referrals; non-prosecution solutions; not to indict solutions; criminal prosecution bodies

Summary/Abstract: In this article, the author presents the situation of admissibility of judicial redress against the solutions delivered by the Public Ministry to reject the criminal referrals filed by the Romanian Court of Accounts. The structure and the content of the study reveal the comments on certain general considerations, on the procedural issues of the referral procedure of the criminal prosecution bodies, as well as on certain arguments to support the admissibility of remedies at law exercised by the Romanian Court of Accounts against the non-prosecution or not to indict solutions. Finally, the author formulates brief considerations regarding the conclusion of the respective study, that of admissibility for the Romanian Court of Accounts to exercise remedies at law against the non-prosecution or not to indict solutions issued by the criminal prosecution bodies, in files constituted as a result of the referrals filed by this institution.

  • Issue Year: 2016
  • Issue No: 04
  • Page Range: 051-061
  • Page Count: 11
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode