ДВА АРГУМЕНТА В ОПРОВЕРЖЕНИЕ РЕЛЯТИВИЗМА В ДИАЛОГЕ ПЛАТОНА «ТЕЭТЕТ»
TWO ARGUMENTS AGAINST RELATIVISM IN PLATO’S THEAETETUS
Author(s): Vsevolod LadovSubject(s): Epistemology, Logic, Ancient Philosphy
Published by: Новосибирский государственный университет
Keywords: relativism; contradiction; self-reference; logic; epistemology; Russell; theory of types;
Summary/Abstract: In this article, I analyze two arguments against relativism in Plato’s «Theaetetus». Which argument is stronger from a logical point of view? Having used some results of contemporary research on the logic of paradoxes, I give my version of the answer to that question. The results of my analysis may be used in investigating the history of ancient philosophy as well as in contemporary epistemology.
Journal: ΣΧΟΛΗ. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция
- Issue Year: X/2016
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 205-213
- Page Count: 9
- Language: Russian
