Combatting fraud as a disincentive of an unintended economic migrant: A comparative review of the direct Turkish model and the indirect Australian model
Combatting fraud as a disincentive of an unintended economic migrant: A comparative review of the direct Turkish model and the indirect Australian model
Author(s): Sherene Özyürek, Rodger FernandezSubject(s): Politics / Political Sciences, Social Sciences, Economy, Civil Law, Labor relations, Nationalism Studies, Economic development, Law on Economics, Migration Studies, Ethnic Minorities Studies
Published by: Transnational Press London
Keywords: Australian Public Interest Criteria 4020; combatting fraud; migration review tribunal; Turkey’s foreigners and protection law; unintended economic migrants;
Summary/Abstract: AS OF JANUARY 12, 2021, THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN ON AUTHORS' REQUEST Under the new Turkish Law on Foreigners and International Protection (Article 54) represents a rapid deterrent approach as the consequences of fraud are implemented within 30 days. In contrast to the Turkish approach, Public Interest Criteria 4020 used in Australian law implies a lengthy process that may take up to two years. A quantitative analysis of retrospective data (2010-2014) of the Australian Migration Review Tribunal substantiated the notion that in contrast to the Turkish model, the Australian model is used as a procrastinating tool to the advantage of unintended economic migrants to remain in Australia.
Journal: Border Crossing
- Issue Year: 6/2016
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 16-26
- Page Count: 11
- Language: English
