Further Observations on the Restitution of Art, Judaica, and Other Cultural Property Plundered in Serbia
Further Observations on the Restitution of Art, Judaica, and Other Cultural Property Plundered in Serbia
Author(s): Wesley A. FisherSubject(s): History of the Holocaust, History of Antisemitism
Published by: HESPERIAedu
Keywords: Restitution; artworks; Yugoslavia; Serbia; Jewish; cultural property; Nazis; plunder
Summary/Abstract: Following on the overview presented at the first annual Holocaust and Restitution Conference concerning what is known about the expropriation of cultural property in Serbia during World War II and where that cultural property is presently located, ways in which restitution of art, Judaica, and other cultural property might best be implemented are discussed. Serbia is encouraged to do historical research on the history of cultural plunder during World War II and on what was restituted to Serbia and within Serbia after the War, and to create a listing or database on the internet of what was taken in Serbia, noting what was subsequently returned and what is still missing. An entity should be responsible for provenance research in the country, either one that actually does the research as in Austria or one that oversees the research carried out by museums, libraries, and archives as in the Netherlands. Information should be made public over the internet of the results of such provenance research. A separate entity, as neutral and independent as possible, should be responsible for restitution decisions based on the provenance research. Serbia should pass legislation covering the return of private movable cultural property that is applicable to both Serbian and foreign citizens. Preferably there should be no deadline for claims for cultural property, whether individual or communal, since such cultural property is often not immediately identifiable. A non-bureaucratic process for filing claims should be established. Cultural property for which original owners and heirs are not identified (heirless property) should be listed on an internet site so that potential claimants can come forward. Such items should not necessarily move from their current location, but their provenance history should be publicly noted.
Journal: LIMESplus
- Issue Year: 2015
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 89-96
- Page Count: 8
- Language: English