CRITICA REGLEMENTĂRILOR PARALELE ŞI CONTRADICTORII ALE UNOR INSTITUŢII JURIDICE
“CRITICISM OF PARALLEL AND CONTRADICTORY REGULATIONS OF CERTAIN LEGAL INSTITUTIONS”

Summary/Abstract: In this study, the author deals with the issue of parallel and contradictory regulations of certain legal institutions set up despite the interdiction of this type of regulations according to Law no.24/2000 on the legislative technique norms for drawing up regulatory acts. The structure and the content of the study reveal the comments on the interdiction of parallel regulation, on the breach in the law-making process, of the legislative technique norms set up under Law no.24/2000, on the regulation of the civil liability of the notary public under tort law, on the competitions between the special codes and laws, on the parallel and contradictory regulation of the town planning certificate, on the deficiencies in the law-making process, considering, for the purpose of the above-mentioned, the doctrine developed by famous names in the matter of law (S. Neculaescu, D.M. Gavriş, I. Popa, A.A. Moise, C. Zamşa, G. Răducan, C.C. Dinu, D. Alexandresco, G. Plastara, A. Pop, Gh. Beleiu, V.D. Zlătescu, A.P. Dimitriu, E. Herovanu, V.G. Cădere, A. Hilsenrad, I. Stoenescu, S. Zilberstein, V. Negru, D. Radu, V.M. Ciobanu, I. Leş, M. Tăbârcă, Gh. Dobrican, M. Fodor, V. Lozneanu, I.N. Pîrvu, N. Popa, V. Hanga, I. Deleanu, Gh. Buta, Ş. Beligrădeanu, D. Alexandrescu, C. Hamangiu, I. Rosetti-Bălănescu, Al. Băicoianu, L.B. Boila). Finally, the author puts forward short brief considerations about the requirements of a good law-making process.

• Details
• Contents