Practical valences of the contestation for annulment in the criminal trial Cover Image
  • Price 4.90 €

Valențe practice ale contestației în anulare în procesul penal
Practical valences of the contestation for annulment in the criminal trial

Author(s): Carmen Balaci
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: contestation for annulment; prescription for criminal liability; more favourable criminal law; consequences of the admission of the contestation for annulment; rehearing of the appeal; non-aggravation

Summary/Abstract: In case of admission of the extraordinary remedy of the contestation for annulment, based on the provisions of Article 426 b) of the Criminal Procedure Code (the defendant has been convicted, although there was evidence of a cause of cessation of the criminal trial), declared exclusively by the convicted person, the court proceeds to rehearing the ordinary remedy of the appeal, in compliance with the principle of non-aggravation of the legal situation of the convicted person, as well as by taking into account, where relevant, the principle of application of the more favourable criminal law in order to calculate the date on which the special prescription period for criminal liability expired.

  • Issue Year: 2017
  • Issue No: 02
  • Page Range: 144-154
  • Page Count: 11
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode