Discussions about a case where the prosecution bodies were deprived of liberty within the premises of a city hall, on the occasion of finding a flagrant offence of corruption Cover Image
  • Price 4.90 €

Discuții în legătură cu un caz în care organele de urmărire penală au fost private de libertate în sediul unei primării, cu ocazia constatării unei infracțiuni flagrante de corupție
Discussions about a case where the prosecution bodies were deprived of liberty within the premises of a city hall, on the occasion of finding a flagrant offence of corruption

Author(s): Marcel Sandu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: flagrant offence; corruption; illegal deprivation of liberty; outrage.

Summary/Abstract: In this article, the author argues that the offences of deprivation of liberty and outrage committed against the criminal prosecution bodies on the occasion of finding a flagrant offence of corruption have prejudiced the public confidence in the possibilities of the competent authorities to combat such forms of criminal illicitness, the climate of public order and peace being also affected and the impact in the media being significant. It is clearly reflected from the contents of the publicized facts a shade of hilarity on the criminal prosecution bodies, an aspect that generates feelings of insecurity among the public, the comments made by readers of the online media being also made in this respect. Considering these aspects, the author initiates some discussions on the mentioned case, by presenting data about the legal proceedings, the duration thereof, the pronounced solutions, the factual situation, the means of evidence and others.

  • Issue Year: 2015
  • Issue No: 10
  • Page Range: 107-112
  • Page Count: 6
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode