THEORETICAL AND JURISPRUDENTIAL ASPECTS CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE COURT APPEAL ON POINTS OF LAW
THEORETICAL AND JURISPRUDENTIAL ASPECTS CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE COURT APPEAL ON POINTS OF LAW
Author(s): Marius AndreescuSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Universitatea Nicolae Titulescu
Keywords: Appeal on points of law; the compulsoriness of the law interpretations for the law courts; The control of constitutionality of the decisions given for resolving the appeals on points of law; Supremacy of Constitution
Summary/Abstract: The institution of the appeal on points of law has the role to ensure a unitary law interpretation and enforcing by the law courts. The legal nature of this procedure is determined not only by the civil and criminal normative dispositions that regulate it. In this study we bring arguments according to which this institution is of a constitutional nature, because according to the Constitution, the High Court of Cassation and Justice has the attribution to ensure the unitary interpretation of the law by the law courts. Thus are analysed the constitutional nature consequences of this institution, the limits of compulsoriness of law interpretations given by the Supreme Court through the decisions ruled on this procedure, and also the relationship between the decisions of the Constitutional Court, respectively the decisions of the High Court of Cassation and Justice given for resolving the appeals on points of law. The recent jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court reveals new aspects regarding the possibility to verify the constitutionality of the decisions given in this matter.
Journal: LESIJ - Lex ET Scientia International Journal
- Issue Year: XXI/2014
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 64-76
- Page Count: 13
- Language: English