Semnificația juridică a sintagmei „eroare materială” – condiție a exercitării contestației în anulare în procesul civil
Legal meaning of the phrase „material error” – condition for exercising the contestation for annulment in the civil trial
Author(s): Alexandru Țiclea, Anabella-Gloria Niculescu-GorpinSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: mistake; material error; legal rule; interpretation; contestation for annulment; civil procedure; case law; doctrine.
Summary/Abstract: One of the extraordinary legal remedies regulated by the Civil Procedure Code is the contestation for annulment. According to Article 503 (2) point 2 and (3) of the Civil Procedure Code, the judgments of the courts of recourse, as well as those of the courts of appeal, may be challenged with a contestation for annulment where the settlement given to that legal remedy is the result of a material error. Besides the phrase „material error”, used in other texts as well, the phrase „material mistake” or the phrase „material mistakes” can also be found in the Code. Thus we appreciate that the legislator was not consistent with the terminology mentioned. It uses the very same phrase, in different contexts and with different meanings, which creates confusions in the interpretation and application of the legal texts. For the lexical and semantic consideration of the phrase „material error”, included in Article 503 (2) point 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, and of the methods of interpretation of the legal rules, it can be concluded that this phrase can not be reduced only to certain procedural errors, but it could also enable the correction of the errors of judgment.
Journal: Revista „Dreptul”
- Issue Year: 2017
- Issue No: 10
- Page Range: 27-39
- Page Count: 13
- Language: Romanian
- Content File-PDF