A Review of the Habilitation Thesis by A. V. Yampolskaya «Phenomenological Method and Its
Limits: from German to French Phenomenology» Cover Image

Рецензия на докторскую диссертацию А. В. ЯМПОЛЬСКОЙ «ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ МЕТОД И ЕГО ГРАНИЦЫ: ОТ НЕМЕЦКОЙ К ФРАНЦУЗСКОЙ ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИИ» М.: На правах рукописи, 2013
A Review of the Habilitation Thesis by A. V. Yampolskaya «Phenomenological Method and Its Limits: from German to French Phenomenology»

Author(s): Andrei Patkul
Subject(s): Phenomenology
Published by: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета
Keywords: phenomenological method; French and German phenomenology; E. Husserl; M. Heidegger; E. Levinas; M. Henry; J.-L. Marion; M. Richir

Summary/Abstract: According to Yampolskaya, the main methodological difficulty of phenomenology is the uncertainty ofthe correlation between the method and the object. This uncertainty reveals ambiguity in the interpretationof the concept of phenomenon. These basic difficulties encountered by the German phenomenologyof Husserl and Heidegger have brought to life French phenomenology. Yampolskaya suggests thatthe key feature of French phenomenology is that it expresses less interest in the problem of reductionand more interest in different components of phenomenological method. Unlike German phenomenologists,who consider phenomenology to be the description of the evident, French thinkers see phenomenologyas a description of concealed.

  • Issue Year: 2/2013
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 215-222
  • Page Count: 8
  • Language: Russian
Toggle Accessibility Mode