Romania’s Constitutional Court Jurisprudence relating to Medical Law
Romania’s Constitutional Court Jurisprudence relating to Medical Law

Summary/Abstract: In concordance with the Court’s decisions to admit some claims, interpretive decisions are deemed to have particular importance in the field of Medical Law due to the salvaging effects these have on the active content of this specific branch of the law. In light of the Medical Law realm, the constitutional Court’s jurisprudence reveals the predominant nature of notifications being brought before the Disputed Claims Office whose object is that of unconstitutionality exceptions with regard to laws and ordinances or to dispositions in laws and ordinances pertaining to this particular branch of the law. The fundamental right to healthcare is available to natural or legal persons operating in the medical profession, including those working in Romanian’s Ministry of Health – when the are no other legal means available for redressing states of unconstitutionality.

• Details
• Contents