THE EXEMPTION PROVISIONS OF THE SALES CONVENTION, INCLUDING COMMENTS ON “HARDSHIP” DOCTRINE AND THE 19 JUNE 2009 DECISION OF THE BELGIAN CASSATION COURT
THE EXEMPTION PROVISIONS OF THE SALES CONVENTION, INCLUDING COMMENTS ON “HARDSHIP” DOCTRINE AND THE 19 JUNE 2009 DECISION OF THE BELGIAN CASSATION COURT

Summary/Abstract: This paper addresses the exemptions provisions, articles 79 and 80, of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG). It begins with a general comparison of the two provisions, exploring the significance of stylistic differences between the detailed, complex, even baroque approach of article 79 and the general, straightforward and vague mode of article 80. The paper then explores a recent decision of the Belgian Court of Cassation holding that the CISG incorporates, as part of its general principles, the “Hardship” provisions (articles 6.2.1 through 6.2.3) of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. The paper argues that this decision distorts the meaning of the CISG, violates the mandate to interpret the Convention with regard for its international character, and threatens the political legitimacy of the treaty.

• Details
• Contents