ПРОТИВТУЖБА И КОМПЕНЗАЦИОНИ ПРИГОВОР У АРБИТРАЖНОМ СПОРУ
CONTERCLAIM AND SET-OFF IN ARBITRATION
Author(s): Vladimir PavićevićSubject(s): International Law
Published by: Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду
Keywords: Arbitration; Counterclaim; Set-off; Jurisdiction; Lis pendens; Res judicata;
Summary/Abstract: Until recently, admissability of counterclaims before international commercial arbitrations has been treated in accordance with a relatively simple forumula -- one had to ascertain the objective scope of the arbitration agreement. With regard to set-off, however, admissability threshold has been less clear and was mostly dependant on relation between the main claim and set-off. Newly promulgated Swiss Arbitration Rules have, for the first time, enabled potential broadening of arbitral jurisdiction over set-off claims, enabling Swiss tribunals to adjudicate even those set-offs that are already subject to another arbitration clause or forum selection clause. This might lead to a potentially dangerous situation where such attraction of jurisdiction might lead to a conflict with another tribunal or court which has expressly been designated as competent with regard to relations which give rise to set-off. This triggers later dilemmas with regard to the reach of decisions on set-off and the possibility that the tribunal applies lis pendens rules in order to avoid conflicting decisions.
Journal: Анали Правног факултета у Београду
- Issue Year: 53/2005
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 145-160
- Page Count: 16
- Language: Serbian