Does Cognitive Science of Religion Undermine Religious Belief?
Does Cognitive Science of Religion Undermine Religious Belief?
Author(s): Paul RezkallaSubject(s): Anthropology, Social Sciences, Theology and Religion, Comparative Studies of Religion, Religion and science , Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology
Published by: Международное философско-космологическое общество
Keywords: religious belief; cognitive science of religion; evolutionary psychology;
Summary/Abstract: In this paper, I discuss what Cognitive Science of Religion is and what its implications are for theism and the veracity of religious belief. Findings in CSR and its counterpart Evolutionary Psychology aim to explain the origin of religious belief. Some critics of religion, however, brandish the findings of CSR in support of their agenda. Their arguments attempt to either argue against the truth of religion or the justification for religious belief. I will argue that neither of these two kinds of arguments accomplishes its goal. Using CSR to falsify religious belief commits the genetic fallacy. The evolutionary debunking argument for undermining justification for religious belief is a more sophisticated approach, but it fails on account of making too many unjustified assumptions. I outline three brief responses to the challenge of unjustified religious belief.
Journal: Philosophy and Cosmology
- Issue Year: 14/2015
- Issue No: 14
- Page Range: 215-221
- Page Count: 7
- Language: English