DOCTRINARY AND LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ERROR
(CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA)
DOCTRINARY AND LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL ERROR
(CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA)
Author(s): Vasilisa MunteanSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Editura Hamangiu S.R.L.
Keywords: judicial error; court, judge; criminal trial; judgment; jurisdiction; criminal investigation
Summary/Abstract: In the research, a doctrinal and legal analysis of the concept of legal error is carried out. The author provides a self-defined definition of the concept addressed and highlights the main causes and conditions for the occurrence of judicial errors.At present, in the specialized legal doctrine of the Republic of Moldova, the problem of defining the judicial error has been little approached. In this respect, this article is a scientific approach aimed at elucidating the theoretical and normative deficiencies and errors that occur in the area of reparation of the prejudice caused by judicial errors.In order to achieve our goal, we aim to create a core of ideas and referral mechanisms that ensure a certain interpretative and decisional homogeneity in the doctrinal and legal characterization of the phrase "judicial error".
Journal: Analele Universității Titu Maiorescu
- Issue Year: 2017
- Issue No: XVI
- Page Range: 132-144
- Page Count: 12
- Language: English
