Ethical and Predatory Publishing: Experiences and Perceptions of Researchers
Ethical and Predatory Publishing: Experiences and Perceptions of Researchers
Author(s): M.P. Yeoh, Ana-Maria Cazan, S. Zaib, W. Muss, Ljubomir JačićSubject(s): Social Sciences, Psychology
Published by: Editura Universitatii Transilvania din Brasov
Keywords: peer-review; predatory journals; academic publishing
Summary/Abstract: This study examines the experiences of how a sample of 30 researchers in Europe and Asia express their perceptions, describe their experiences, and navigate the challenges of predatory publishing. Most of the respondents commented on lack of experience of researchers and also the desire for quick publishing as reasons why inexperienced researchers use predatory journals. Generally, respondents held negative views of predatory journals describing them as fake journals. Respondents indicated that difficulties for ethical publishing despite doing rigorous research. We conclude that we should navigate our publishing so that we have the resources and ability to do an honest, rigorous research.
Journal: Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law
- Issue Year: 10/2017
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 55-66
- Page Count: 12
- Language: English