Оформление прямого дополнения в финно-угорских языках: между предикацией и дискурсом
Direct Object marking in Finno-Ugric languages:
between sentence and discourse
Author(s): Natalia Serdobolskaya, Svetlana ToldovaSubject(s): Language and Literature Studies, Finno-Ugrian studies
Published by: Институт языкознания Российской академии наук
Keywords: Finno-Ugric languages; direct object; possessiveness; differential object marking; discourse categories; definiteness; topic;
Summary/Abstract: The studies of asymmetric types of differential object marking explain the distribution of DO types in terms of animacy, definiteness, information structure, and/or salience as defined in [de Swart 2007: 138]. We show that in Finno-Ugric languages the choice of the DO marking is partly based on the discourse model of the referential choice as described in [Givón 1983, Kibrik 2011]. The definite (or topical) DO may remain unmarked if its referent has a low rank in this model, while an indefinite (focused) DO may be marked if it has a high rank.
Journal: Урало-алтайские исследования
- Issue Year: 2017
- Issue No: 04 (27)
- Page Range: 92-112
- Page Count: 21
- Language: Russian
