Unele aspecte de interes privind interpretarea art. 11 alin. (3) din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 78/2016, referitoare la competența Direcției de Investigare a Infracțiunilor de Criminalitate Organizată și Terorism (D.I.I.C.O.T.)
Some aspects of interest on the interpretation of Article 11 (3) of the Government Emergency Ordinance No 78/2016, referring to the competence of the Directorate for the Investigation of Organized Crime and Terrorism (D.I.I.C.O.T.)

Summary/Abstract: This paper addresses the matter subordinated to the substantive competenceof settlement, during the criminal investigation phase, of the cases in which, initiallyunder the competence of the D.I.I.C.O.T., the procedure of disjunction intervenes.His authors conclude that the provisions of Article 11 (3) of the GovernmentEmergency Ordinance No 78/2016 must in no way be interpreted as being enactedin order to arbitrarily prorogue a prosecutor’s competence, but only for thepurpose of the proper administration of justice, purpose to which any decision ofdisjunction must be subordinated.

• Details
• Contents