Hegemony – Counter Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis of Israeli Settlement Activity
Hegemony – Counter Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis of Israeli Settlement Activity
Author(s): Tuğçe ErsoySubject(s): Civil Society, Political history, Government/Political systems, Sociology of Politics, Peace and Conflict Studies
Published by: Muhammed Mustafa KULU
Keywords: Jewish settlements; Hegemony; Counter-hegemony; Occupied territories; Likud; Gush Emunim;
Summary/Abstract: The settlements, a fact on the ground by today, have had considerable effects both on Palestinian life and on the peace process. Notably, in the quality of irreversible entities, they have emerged as obstacles before a two-state solution. This article is an attempt to analyze the settlement activity in the occupied territories through the Gramscian concept of hegemony. On the first hand, the study will apply the concept of hegemony to the Israeli settlement policy by demonstrating the changing political climate within the country and the ideological attitudes towards the occupied territories. By doing so, the study will seek to reveal how Israel’s settlement activity has become hegemonic. It will also discuss whether Israeli policies vis-à-vis the Palestinians in the occupied territories, which culminated in the First Intifada in 1987, have created a counter-hegemonic alternative in a Gramscian sense.
Journal: FİLİSTİN ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ
- Issue Year: 2018
- Issue No: 3
- Page Range: 44-64
- Page Count: 21
- Language: English