Adaptation and validation of Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale in Chinese population Cover Image

Adaptation and validation of Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale in Chinese population
Adaptation and validation of Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale in Chinese population

Author(s): Simon Ching Lam, Sze Long Zoe Chan, Chun Yin Andy Chong, Wendy Wing-Chi Wong, Jiawen Ye
Subject(s): Behaviorism
Published by: Akadémiai Kiadó
Keywords: adaptation; translation; compulsive buying; behavioral addiction; psychometric testing; Chinese

Summary/Abstract: Compulsive buying (CB) is a behavioral addiction that is conceptualized as an obsessive–compulsive and impulsive–control disorder. The Richmond Compulsive Buying Scale (RCBS), a six-item self-reporting instrument that has been validated worldwide, was developed based on this theoretical background. This study aimed to adapt RCBS to the Chinese population (RCBS-TC) to guide future national and international prevalence studies. Methods. This methodological study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 involved the forward and backward translation of RCBS, the content and face validation of the RCBS, and the evaluation of its translation adequacy. Phase 2 involved the psychometric testing of RCBS-TC for its internal consistency, stability, and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results. In Phase 1, RCBS-TC obtained satisfactory item-level (I-CVI = 83.3%–100%) and scale-level content validity index (CVI/AVE = 97.2%), comprehensibility (100%), and translation adequacy [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.858]. In Phase 2, based on data collected from 821 adults, RCBS-TC demonstrated a satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .88; corrected item-total correlation coefficients = 0.61–0.78) 2-week test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.82 based on 61 university students). For construct validation, the CFA results indicated that the corrected first-order two-factor models were acceptable with the same goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 8.56, CFI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98, IFI = 0.99, and RMSEA = 0.09). The 2-week test–retest reliability of RCBS-TC (n = 61) was also satisfactory (ICC = 0.82). Discussion and conclusions. This methodological study adopted appropriate and stringent procedures to ensure that the translation and validation of RCBS-TC was of quality. The results indicate that this scale has a satisfactory reliability and validity for the Chinese population.

  • Issue Year: 7/2018
  • Issue No: 3
  • Page Range: 760-769
  • Page Count: 10
  • Language: English