ORDINARY OBJECTS ARE NONMODAL OBJECTS Cover Image
  • Price 4.50 €

ORDINARY OBJECTS ARE NONMODAL OBJECTS
ORDINARY OBJECTS ARE NONMODAL OBJECTS

Author(s): Dana Goswick
Subject(s): Epistemology, Logic, Analytic Philosophy
Published by: Addleton Academic Publishers
Keywords: ordinary objects; modality; fine-grained v. course-grained; indeterminacy; empiricism; modal logics;

Summary/Abstract: Although it’s widely recognized that our concepts can differ in grainedness, the corollary question of whether objects can differ in grainedness has been little discussed. My focus in this paper will be on the modal grainedness of physical objects. Intuitively, the more fine-grained something is, the more detail it contains. My objective in this paper is to explore the feasibility of modally coarse-grained objects, i.e. of objects which are such that, for each modal property M, the object neither has nor lacks the property. In section I, I examine whether nonmodal objects are ruled out by logic. In section II, I examine the connection between nonmodal objects and indeterminacy. In section III, I note that the default position in the ordinary object literature is that ordinary objects are modally fine-grained and I examine some difficulties this gives rise to. In section IV, I argue that nonmodal objects can do all the philosophical work standardly attributed to modally fine-grained objects. I conclude, in section V, by noting that, despite the preference of most metaphysicians for modally fine-grained objects, there is some precedence for taking us to inhabit a world of nonmodal objects.

  • Issue Year: 2018
  • Issue No: 17
  • Page Range: 22-37
  • Page Count: 16
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode