The Problem of Understanding of Nature in Exact Science
The Problem of Understanding of Nature in Exact Science
Author(s): Leo NäpinenSubject(s): History of ideas, Philosophy of Science
Published by: Tallinna Tehnikaülikooli õiguse instituut
Keywords: Rein Vihalemm;
Summary/Abstract: In this short inquiry I would like to defend the statement that exact science deals with the explanation of models, but not with the understanding (comprehending) of nature. By the word ‘nature’ I mean nature as physis (as a self-moving and self-developing living organism to which humans also belong), not nature as natura naturata (as a nonevolving creature created by someone or something). The Estonian philosopher of science Rein Vihalemm (2008) has shown with his conception of phi-science (φ-science) that exact science is itself an idealized model or theoretical object derived from Galilean mathematical physics.
Journal: Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
- Issue Year: 2/2014
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 117-122
- Page Count: 6
- Language: English