Dvě funkce testu proporcionality při přezkumu socio-ekonomických práv a pozitivních závazků
The Dual Function of Proportionality Analysis in Socio-economic Rights and Positive Obligations Adjudication
Author(s): Zdeněk ČervínekSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
Published by: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci_1
Keywords: Proportionality;Socio-economic Rights;Positive obligations;European Court of Human Rights;Constitutional Court of Federal Republic Germany;Derivative Constitutional Rights Norms
Summary/Abstract: This paper opposes S. Gardbaum’s argument, that positive obligations and socio-economic rights represent a limit to the use of proportionality, because even courts most committed to it are reluctant to use it in these cases. The main author’s claim is that a different structure of courts‘ argumentation results from a fact that positive obligations and socio-economic rights are not explicitly established in respective bills of rights. Thus, they must be derived from the legal text, which requires a different argumentative structure compared to the analysis under negative obligations.
Journal: Acta Iuridica Olomucensia
- Issue Year: 14/2019
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 64-93
- Page Count: 30
- Language: Czech