Several Considerations on Property Restitution: National Jurisprudence and European Court of Human Rights’ Case-Law
Several Considerations on Property Restitution: National Jurisprudence and European Court of Human Rights’ Case-Law

Summary/Abstract: The unification of jurisprudence represents a cornerstone generated by the necessity to ensure legal security by avoiding divergent ruling in identical matters, and their importance derives also from the European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, such as Beian vs. Romania, Ştefan and Ştef vs. Romania, which underlined that failure to unify jurisprudence may endanger legal security principle and ultimately leads to the reduction of trust of public in judiciary system.

• Details
• Contents