Quality Assurance Frameworks Comparisons in HEIs of Pakistan and China
Quality Assurance Frameworks Comparisons in HEIs of Pakistan and China
Author(s): Urooj FatimaSubject(s): Higher Education
Published by: European Scientific Institute
Keywords: Higher Educational Institutes; Pakistan; China work distribution; access to digital library; number of PhD faculty;
Summary/Abstract: The Higher Education Commission in Pakistan and China is are responsible to check that all educational institutes of Pakistan comply with the Quality Assurance Framework (QAF). Work distribution, access to the digital library and the number of PhD faculty members in the institutes, are important for Higher Educational Institutes (HEIs) because they directly influence on quality of academic education and services being provided to the students. Mixed method approach is adopted. Quantitative results were obtained by carrying out survey in Pakistan while qualitative results were obtained through literature review. This research makes use of quantitative approach and investigates four different HEIs of Pakistan. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: 1) Role of work distribution; 2) access to the digital library; and 3) the number of Faculty members in the PhD faculty. A critical review was carried out for investigating the quality of HEIs in China because survey accessibility issues were faced when adopting quantitative approach. Analysis showed that most of the QAFs in Pakistan were weak in all three factors. Yet China had a better score when compared to Pakistan showing good work distribution; high number of digital libraries; and an adequate number of PhD faculty members.
Journal: European Journal of Educational Sciences
- Issue Year: 7/2020
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 17-36
- Page Count: 20
- Language: English