Thomas Hobbes’s Elements of Law and His Third Objections to Descartes’s Meditations
Thomas Hobbes’s Elements of Law and His Third Objections to Descartes’s Meditations
Author(s): Krzysztof WawrzonkowskiSubject(s): Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Epistemology, Renaissance Philosophy, Early Modern Philosophy
Published by: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Keywords: Hobbes; Descartes; Elements of Law; conceptions; objections; idea; Meditations
Summary/Abstract: In this article I endeavour to present the axis of the dispute between Hobbes and Descartes on the ground of Meditation, and its most important moments. I focus primarily on the analysis of the most important accusations made by Hobbes and the reconstruction of some of his views, which at the time could only be found in The Elements of Law, Nature, and Politics. This work was the first major and coherent attempt to speak out on cognitive-theory and social issues; I strive to defend the thesis that understanding the content of Objections requires knowledge of this work. The mature form of the work shows that the Englishman already had his views well thought-out and could feel quite confident in formulating from their perspective critical remarks on Descartes’s philosophy, to which, it seems, he may have owed quite a lot.
Journal: Roczniki Filozoficzne
- Issue Year: 68/2020
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 179-194
- Page Count: 16
- Language: English