LITIGATION AS A POLITICAL SUBJECTIVATION METHOD IN JACQUES RANCİÉRE Cover Image

JAQUES RANCİÉRE’DE POLİTİK ÖZNELEŞME YÖNTEMİ OLARAK DAVALAŞMA
LITIGATION AS A POLITICAL SUBJECTIVATION METHOD IN JACQUES RANCİÉRE

Author(s): Murat Mustafa Türkmen
Subject(s): Politics, Political Philosophy, Contemporary Philosophy, Social differentiation, Sociology of Politics
Published by: Dicle Üniversitesi, Sivil Havacılık Yüksekokulu
Keywords: Rancière; litigation; being-together; equality; inequality;

Summary/Abstract: Jacques Rancière is one of the most important figures of contemporary political philosophy. His works are positioned both within and against political philosophy. In this text, the question of what is the concept of litigation, which is the form of visibility of the political and how the litigation takes place, is questioned. It is explained what is meant by being-together to the group of subjects who will make the litigation. It is also clarified how it benefited from the philosophical approach from which it took over the expression being-together, and in what ways it was separated from it. The relationship between the litigation and equality/inequality was investigated. Also, the way in which inequality in the equality is visible through litigation is examined. Accordingly, it has been determined that the claim of equality exists since the beginning of politics and why it is not possible to get rid of this equality network that has existed since the formation of society. In this sense, it is clarified why the being-together, which litigates in the process of political subjectivity, should not claim to establish an equal society.

  • Issue Year: 4/2020
  • Issue No: 7
  • Page Range: 284-291
  • Page Count: 8
  • Language: Turkish
Toggle Accessibility Mode