Зміни підходів до адміністрування художньо-виробничих процесів Києво-Межигірської фаянсової фабрики впродовж ХІХ століття
Changes in the approaches to administration of artistic productions processed of the Kyiv-Mezhigirsk Faience Factory during the ХІХ century

Summary/Abstract: The purpose of the article is to characterize the specifics of the management of the artistic and production part of the Kyiv-Mezhigirsk Faience Factory factory and outline the line of product development in this regard. The methodology includes the association of the historical-chronological approach, historical and cultural, axiological, and a method of assumptions that allow trying to build a line of art management Kyiv-Mezhigirsk Faience Factory within 1798 – 1876. The scientific novelty consists of the judgment of vectors of influence on the development of the manufacture of persons of directors and the main masters, the part from which was artists or engineers. Conclusions. Directors and main masters of Kyiv-Mezhigirsk Faience Factory during 1798 – 1874/1876 formed a line of development of an industrial part of the enterprise as follows: in submission to Kyiv (1798 – 1822) – as directed the Kyiv city council (the modern language – the mayoralties) and the Kyiv governor general and according to own knowledge concerning art specificity of manufacturing of industrial faience and porcelain; during a time of submission of the Office of its imperial majesty in St.-Petersburg (the Cabinet equivalent, with 1822 for 1858) – according to orders personally the emperor (from Paul І, Alexander І, Nikolay І to Alexander ІІ) and its Office at which it was appointed Operating imperial factories, it is frequent during this period on a place directors from engineers and so-called mountain conductors supervised; during last period of activity (1858 – 1874/1876) submission remains to the same, as during previous time, however, as a matter of fact, tenants and proprietors (first of all, brothers M. O. and V. O. Barskie and their main master Karl Peter, and M. V. Govorov about which art part it is not known).

• Details
• Contents