Reward-Allocation Judgments in Romania: A Factorial Survey Approach Cover Image

Reward-Allocation Judgments in Romania: A Factorial Survey Approach
Reward-Allocation Judgments in Romania: A Factorial Survey Approach

Author(s): Carmen Buzea, Fons J.R. van de Vijver, Luiza Mesesan-Schmitz
Subject(s): Social Sciences
Published by: Expert Projects Publishing
Keywords: reward allocation; normative judgments; factorial survey; Romania; norms

Summary/Abstract: We investigated reward-allocation judgments when positive outcomes (monetary rewards) were distributed and the allocator was not a co-recipient, in a sample of 200 Romanian students. Within a full factorial survey design, seven factors, selected to affect the allocation decision, were orthogonally varied. The factors reflect individual characteristics of the recipients (gender, age, contribution, need, work experience) and situational characteristics (future work interaction and task routineness). Romanian students preferred to allocate rewards applying an equity-based distribution model. Work experience and task routineness were also significant, yet less important. The recipient gender has no effect on allocation judgments. In terms of between-respondents variability, we found that students’ gender, work experience, and age do not have an impact on reward-allocation judgments. We discuss implications of our findings for organizations and practitioners.

  • Issue Year: 2013
  • Issue No: 40
  • Page Range: 107-123
  • Page Count: 17
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode