Scientometrické hodnocení kvality vědecké práce, jeho meze a nebezpečí redukcionismu
Scientometric assessment of the quality of scientific work, its limits and the danger of reductionism

Summary/Abstract: The article discusses the limitations and dangers of reductionism in the scientometric evaluation of scientific work quality, particularly through the use of impact factors. It highlights that while this method is suitable for natural and medical sciences, it may not be appropriate for social sciences and legal studies due to their unique subject matter and objectives. The author argues that scientometric methods can lead to scientism and reductionism, which may not fairly assess the quality of work in these fields. The article calls for the development of alternative evaluation criteria that align with the specific nature of legal and social sciences. It also emphasizes the importance of scientific ethics and the need for a more nuanced approach to evaluating scientific work. The discussion includes the potential influence of subjective factors and the need for transparent and fair evaluation processes.

• Details
• Contents